Skip to main content

Week 3: Workshop Week! by Amanda Berrian

Figure 1. Violet steps into the role of teacher at the first workshop in Athol

March 20, 2016: Week 3 was a whirlwind with three workshops in three different villages across the Mnisi community. The first was in Athol and, after receiving a confirmation for 20 attendees, we were delighted to see 31 eager and interested participants. The church was bustling with men and women, young and old, all wanting to learn about how they could improve the health of their households. I was amazed at how the Environmental Monitors could capture each and everyone’s attention and how comfortable they were standing in front of the room next to a flip chart. I watched as the lessons I had taught them a week ago were being translated and presented by the Environmental Monitors to a new audience. I could see how they were applying the principles of inquiry and making the workshops learner- rather than teacher-centered. I observed the activities and looked on proudly as the learners “milked cows” and “picked vegetables” to learn the concepts of infectious disease transmission.
Figure 2. Participants, with the guidance from the Environmental Monitors, act out scenarios to learn about disease transmission in Activity 1

Figure 3. Environmental Monitors guide the learners through the curriculum at the first workshop in Gottenburg

Figure 4. Handry describes the One Health Risk Assessment Tool to a small group at the first workshop in Gottenburg

The second workshop was our biggest with 38 total participants. Five Environmental Monitors facilitated the workshop and again impressed me with their ability to apply the pedagogical concepts and teach the curriculum to their diverse audience.
Figure 5. Philemon address the group at the first Utha workshop

The third workshop took place in Utha and included nine participants. Two Environmental Monitors facilitated this workshop which consisted primarily of younger adults.
Figure 6. Participants from the Utha workshop learn about disease transmission during Activity 1

After the first workshop, each of the 78 total participants were visited by an Environmental Monitor to help them complete their household One Health Risk Assessment Tool and capture photographs. Each participant was instructed to bring their tools and photographs to the second workshop to facilitate the completion of a Risk Mitigation Plan.
Figure 7. Justify prints photographs of high risk practices for a workshop participant

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to the UC Davis Blum Center Blog!

Here you will find updates on our organization, and blog posts written by each of our Blum Fellows about their experiences abroad. Make sure to check out our website at blumcenter.ucdavis.edu, and like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/UCDavisBlumCenter to get regular updates and see our upcoming events.

Manufacturing in Phnom Penh by Purva Juvekar

During winter and spring quarter 2017, my teammates and I (Team WASHOut) designed a sanitation station using a Biosand Filter. This was our effort towards providing clean water to students in floating schools on the Tonle Sap lake. We were provided with the opportunity to go to Cambodia and implement our project in person through the Blum grant, and we worked with Wetlands Work!, our clients for the senior design class. Figure 1 Rendering of Sanitation Station   We spent our time at UC Davis designing the station – sketches, CAD models, renderings, dimensions, engineering analysis and testing. We made a prototype in Davis, which we showed during the Senior Design Showcase in June, to test flow rates and water quality standards. The next step was to take the design to Phnom Penh and manufacture it there. We got to work as soon as we got there. My teammate and I were introduced to people on the WW! team who could help with translation, and we began scouting the city to fin...

Pedaling for Water in Kisumu: Closing, By Abe McKay

Pedaling for Water in Kisumu: Closing (3 of 3) 2017.09.12 In my second week in Kenya, I was back to visiting farmers, both with Vibrant Village and through other connections. However, I receive my biggest surprize in between site visits. I was walking with Ernest Kulali, a field officer and farmer from Vibrant Village, and he was telling me about the effectiveness of farming techniques. Using traditional methods, Ernest was getting 20kg of maize (corn) in a season from his shamba , his farm . When he switched to using purchased seeds and fertilizer, the same land produced 360 to 540kg of maize. What!? I had him run the numbers by me again, 20kgs → the range of 400kgs. I still didn’t believe it, but Nick the Vibrant Village director later agreed that farmers were seeing that magnitude of increase. Not just doubling their income/food supply, but a twenty-fold return! Further farming modifications will not yield as large a jump, but that sort of scale encouraged me that changing te...